Michael

  • Understanding Balance Sheet: A Comprehensive Guide for Beginners

    In previous episodes of the Learning Finance series, We’ve learned Basics of Balance Sheet , different types of assets , how to use Balance Sheet to understand how companies work, and the basic rules of asset pricing system. We’ve also learned different types of liabilities, and the four components of the Shareholder’s Equity. Now we will look at what the balance sheet actually tells us, the information behind the terminologies and numbers.

    Understanding Assets

    Let’s start from the left side of the balance sheet – Assets.

    Before we ask the question “how much have I made?”, we want to make sure that the money I put into the company in the first place is safe. In other words, I want to know what the invested money has turned into.

    What has my investment (money) in a company turned into?

    This is what the left side of the Balance Sheet – Assets – tells us. Instead of just a pile of cash lying in the bank, some has become accounts receivable, some raw materials, finished goods , or product in progress, some factory plants, cars, computers, and office buildings, some rights of the land, patents and proprietary technology. And some are still lying in the bank in the form of cash. Essentially the Assets on the Balance Sheet tells us what our originally invested money has been used for.

    Understanding Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity

    What does the right side – Liabilities and Shareholder’s Equity – tells us?

    The right side tells us where your money comes from. While I might come up with a certain amount of money out of my personal pocket, I might also borrow money from the bank as loans. On top of that, I might also owe money to suppliers, customers, employees, or the Tax Bureau, etc.

    Assets = Liabilities + Shareholders’ Equity

    Obviously, the money raised (the right side of Balance Sheet) must be equal to the money spent (the left side of Balance Sheet). I cannot spend money I don’t have; or put it in another way, if I want to spend money I don’t have, I will have to borrow it from somebody else, thus owing them debts, and I cannot create assets out of thin air.

    Assets = Liabilities + Shareholders’ Equity

    Assets equal Liabilities plus Shareholders’ equity is the most basic logic on the Balance Sheet, and it is also the most basic in accounting.

    💡
    Assets = Liabilities + Shareholders’ Equity is considered an axiom. It is always correct, and must be obeyed in any financial statement.

    If you see a company’s statements do not conform to this relationship, the only possible explanation is that the statements are wrong. The equation must be obeyed at all times.

    The formula that assets equal liabilities plus equity can be easily restructured into two equations:

    1. By moving liabilities to the left, the equation becomes liability equal to the assets minus equity
    2. By moving equity to the left, the equation becomes equity equal to assets minus liabilities

    From a mathematical point, both restructured equations are correct. But from an economic aspect, only one is correct. Which one do you think it is?

    Well only the second – shareholders’ equity = assets – liabilities – is correct. Why is that?

    Let’s look at the first. 

    The first equation means that after we allow shareholders to take back the money invested from assets, the remaining amount belongs to the bank. The owner of the company becomes the bank, which is not true.

    On the other hand, the second equation means that after the company pays all the debts we owe to the bank and the rest of creditors, the remaining assets belong to shareholders. The shareholders own the company.

    In other words, the shareholders own what’s left after the company repays all of the liabilities. This is called residual claims.

    What if the company runs well and its assets actually have appreciated over time (great news!)? 

    Well the bank will not ask you to repay more than your debt for your profitable business, since the debt to the bank is fixed. Therefore, the shareholders own the asset appreciation. 

    But if the company is running poorly, and its assets actually become devalued over time, the bank will not grant you to repay less debt. Then you might run into a financial crisis. My debt to the bank is always fixed, so the asset depreciation has to be borne by me – the shareholder.

    Then what is the ultimate goal for a company? A company should be making money for shareholders.

    Recall that at the beginning, I’ve established that before I ask if I’ve made any money from the company, I want to know if my investment, i.e. my principal, is still safe, or what it has become. The balance sheet helps me answer that question. It gives me a breakdown of all items that my money has become, and has put a dollar amount behind each item. The asset items are the resources I have in running the company. 

    If the balance sheet tells me that the total asset is worth 100 dollars, does it mean that the company has 100 dollars worth of assets now? In the past year, i.e. having this 100 dollars at all times over the past 12 months? 

    Of course, the first explanation is correct. That is, the company has 100 dollars worth of assets at this particular moment. It’s like I’m taking a photo of the resources of the company, documenting what it has right now, without bothering whether it will change into in the future. Neither do I care what it looks like before the picture is taken.

    Assets vs. Physical Properties

    Asset and physical property are two different concepts. 

    Here physical property means something tangible, i.e. physical things that I can touch. What could be an asset item that’s not a physical property? 

    Let’s look at the Assets on the balance sheet.

    Among all asset items, we see things such as accounts receivable, prepaid account, etc., that are just my rights. Even though I do own these rights to future claims, I cannot touch such a “right”, since it doesn’t have a physical form. Sometimes I don’t even have a certificate for them like a contract. However, we still say that this is an asset.

    On the contrary, sometimes we do have physical properties in presence, but they are NOT our assets.

    For example, I may rent someone else’s equipment. Even though I have the right to use it during that time, the equipment is not an asset item on my balance sheet. Another example would be the products I sell as a commissioned agent. Even though these products are stored in my company’s warehouse, they are not my assets.

    Relationship between Assets and Costs/ Expenses

    If you recall, there is an item called deferred expenses on the Balance Sheet that we discussed previously. Deferred expenses are really assets, but they will partially get expended as time goes by. Same thing happens for fixed assets and long-term deferred expenses. They gradually wear out, and the wear and tear become depreciation. 

    This depreciation is a kind of cost; put it in other words, assets today are costs tomorrow. They are the same thing in different times.


    Now we understand why we need a balance sheet; since our investment in the company has now become a variety of things, we want to know the value of my principal investment. And the Balance Sheet can help us do just that – it describes the financial position of our company at a particular point of time.

  • Shareholder’s Equity: the Last Piece on Balance Sheet

    In previous episodes of the Learning Finance series, I’ve learned Basics of Balance Sheet , different types of assets, how to use Balance Sheet to understand how companies work, and the basic rules of asset pricing system . I’ve also learned different types of liabilities. Now we will look at the last section on the Balance Sheet – Shareholder’s Equity.

    There are four items in Shareholder’s Equity: 

    1. Capital Stock
    2. Additional paid-in capital 
    3. Surplus reserve
    4. Retained earnings

    Let’s go over these together.

    There are mainly two ways shareholders can invest in a company. 

    First, shareholders can inject money into the company as their investment. By doing so, the shareholder’s money will become the company’s money, and the shareholder will receive equity, i.e. proof of ownership in the company, in exchange. This is a form of external investment.

    Second, when the company makes a profit in its operations, the profit is originally owned by the shareholder. However, the shareholder may decide not to take the profit home but instead keep it in the company. This is also a form of investment, but internal.

    For the four items mentioned above, which ones are external, and which internal?

    It’s difficult to know the answer just by their names without fully understand what they are, but you can still guess that capital stock might be a form of external investment, and retainied earning is a form of internal investment. If those are your answers, then you guessed them right.

    But what about additional paid-in capital and surplus reserve?

    Right now, let’s just take note of the answer that additional paid-in capital is external, and surplus reserve is internal. By the end of this article, you will be able to understand what they are, and why.

    External Investments

    When capital comes in, it’s recorded on the Balance Sheet separately under two lines of items in the Shareholder’s Equity Section, Capital Stock and Additional Paid-in Capital.

    Why do we account them in two separate items?

    Capital Stock (Share Capital, Paid-in Capital, Equity…)

    This is arguably the most important item. At least I think that way. 

    However, this item can get a little bit confusing, since you may not always see the name Capital Stock on a balance sheet. Different types of companies may use different names for essentially the same thing. 

    For example, the concept of “stock” only exists in public companies, i.e. only when a company goes public will its stocks be created. So in public companies, you will see this item with the names like Capital Stock, Share Capital, etc. In private companies, or limited liability companies, the same item is called paid-in capital. However, no matter what names are used, the meaning is the same. 

    In certain countries such as China, every company needs a registered capital required by law. That is, when you form a company, you have to inject money into the new entity. The amount of money that you inject is called registered capital. In China, the value of capital stock (or share capital, paid-in capital) must be equal to the registered capital. In other countries, such registered capital requirements is not necessary, so this item won’t necessarily equal registered capital. All money invested is considered original fund of the company.

    However, you might be wondering this:

    If the actual money invested is more than the registered capital, where does the extra money go on our Balance Sheet?

    The answer is Additional paid-in capital.

    Additional Paid-in Capital (Capital Reserve, Treasure Shares…)

    There is one type of company that will always have additional paid-in capital on its balance sheet. That type of company is publicly traded company. Why?

    We know that publicly listed companies issues shares to the public. For example, when it issues 100 million shares of stock at 20 dollars per share, how should we record this transaction?

    By doing some simple math, we know that the company raised 2 billion dollars. Since the nominal value per share is one dollar, we will record 100 million dollars as Capital Stock. The rest 1.9 billion dollars will be kept in Additional Paid-in Capital, as known as Capital Reserve or Treasure Shares.

    The above example described how a publicly traded company accumulates capital reserve. But how can private companies generate additional paid-in capital? Let’s look at this example.

    Say I invested one million dollars to start a small company. After a few years, the business runs well, and someone is interested in investing in my company. After some due dilligence and negotiations, we finally reached a deal: I agreed to sell 50% of the company for five million dollars. In other words, we both agreed that the company is worth 10 million dollars now.

    But the thing is that I invested one million dollars and my new partner will invest five million dollars. How can I document this investment on the Balance Sheet so the shares are split 50/50, not 5/6 for him and 1/6 for me?

    The answer lies in additional paid-in capital.

    Out of the five million dollars, one million will go in paid-in capital, matching my initial one million-dollar investment and boosting the total equity to two million. The other four million dollars will go into additional paid-in capital. Since ownership percentage is only calculated by paid-in capital, the company’s ownership is now split equally between the two of us. The other four million dollars in the additional paid-in capital are now owned by all shareholders of the company.

    That means I now own two million dollars out of the four. The second this investor invested five million dollars in my company, two million dollars will evaporate instantaneously out of his pocket. Why did he do that?

    When I started the company from my own one million dollars, the company was worth just that. But after so many years, I’ve built up the company to a higher level, far more valuable than what it was. From this perspective, the investor exchanged his two million for the 50% of the company income in the future.

    💡
    Paid-in Capital (or Equity) is a very important item, a concept of great legal significance. 
    First, at least in China, the total amount of Paid-in Capital is equal to the company’s registered capital, which is the company’s maximum external legal liability should it be subject to bankruptcy
    Second, the capital structure reflects the division of interest among the company’s shareholders. That is, when the company has more than one shareholder, the division of shares is NOT in accordance with each shareholder’s total capital contributions, but with the proportion of Paid-in Capital. 

    Internal Investments

    When a company makes a profit, the shareholders can choose to either distribute those profits to themselves or keep them in the company. If they choose to keep the profits in the company, those profits essentially become internal investments.

    Surplus Reserve (only in certain countries)

    Surplus reserve is profit that cannot be distributed by the law. In some countries such as China, the law stipulates that a company must retain some profit as surplus reserve in the company. In other words, if the company earns 10 million dollars this year, I must leave at least one million in the company as surplus reserve. 

    Shareholders are free to distribute the remaining nine million dollars; for example, they may decide to distribute three million dollars to all shareholders, and leave six million dollars in the company.

    Retained Earnings

    Where should we put the remaining six million dollars? In the retained earnings.


    By far we have gained a more complete understanding about the balance sheet. We’ve already known the meaning and composition of assets, liabilities and shareholders’ equity respectively. Later we will look at how the balance sheet presents a complete picture of a company’s finance.

  • Geography and Identity: How Cities I’ve Lived in Shape Who I Am Today

    I’ve been traveling in the past few days to Hong Kong and Shenzhen. Compared with Shanghai, these cities are more or less the same when looking on the outside, but when you spend a few days there, you inevitably experience the nuanced differences, like how people behave, how streets are structured, etc. These details together build up the personality of a city, and will influence people living there.

    I was born and raised in a small town in central China. Living in a small city grants me the benefit of not worrying about things such as traffic, since there weren’t too many cars on the roads back then. All I cared about was basketball and classes. 

    Growing up a city boy, I didn’t experience any major cities until my teenage years, when I participated in a summer camp in Beijing. Yet just spending a couple of days didn’t leave me too much an impression.

    Like most people, the very first time that I lived by myself was when I went to college. However, even though I studied in a large city in the south – the City of Guangzhou – the campus still functioned as a bubble, sheltering me (and the rest of my classmates) from the outside world. I used to go downtown in one of the busiest malls, soaking in all the commercial establishment for the first time. The personality of the city, however, never really left a mark on me.


    Columbia, South Carolina was my next destination. This was the very first time that I left the country, and everything was so new. I was extremely nervous during the whole time, but was also very excited. Everything was so different, from the language, to how things were done. I was busy with my classes, but I was also determined to get the most out of the experience, knowing that I might not be able to return again for the rest of my life. I went to most football games during that season; the music, sports, food, and booze were all part of the experience. 

    Columbia was not exactly a college town. It had businesses, and communities were involved but not dedicated to the Gamecock athletics. People loved the team, but they still had their own jobs and daily lives. I used to shoot shit with my neighbors during the weekend, talking about things like the differences between different cities and countries. 

    Looking back, Columbia was not the most impressive city at all. It was pretty boring; it didn’t have the natural resources like beaches or mountains, like Charleston does. I was more influenced by the university than the city. Put it another way, there wouldn’t be a reason for me to go back other than visiting my alma mater (I bleed garnet and black!). 

    Downtown Columbia is pretty underwhelming…

    Hong Kong was the first city I lived in for a job, and my professional career intertwined with the city for the next few years. The city was probably one of the most well-known, if not the most, in China. The skyline was so glamorous that when I got there for the first time from Columbia, I almost had a panic attack. I was so used to the open space and scarcity of people on the streets, so the crowded, narrow streets left me little space to set a foot. It was definitely overwhelming.

    I had to wear a suit and tie every day going to work, even though I was just an intern. The average work hours each week amounted to 50+ hours, and that was still on the lower end in the city. It’s quite normal for a junior full-time staff to work 60 hours each week. This workaholic-like culture benefited the restaurants, and they would serve food from the early morning till midnight, since people didn’t get off work until 8 or 9 pm. 

    There were always things going on in the city too. You could go to a concert, a book fair, a religious event, the clubs, or simply go on a hike to the mountains or go to the beach. Hong Kong was this interesting city where even though the population was one of the densest in the world, over 70% of the city were left undeveloped. You can take a bus and it will get you to the nearest beach in less than an hour. Even when I was still a humble intern, I’d go to the beach every Sunday, spending 40 HKD on the round-trip fares, 100 HKD on a locker and 40 HKD on a beer, chilling for the whole afternoon.

    A city is more about the people than the skyscrapers. When I was there for the first time, most people knew me as someone coming from the US, so the main language was English. My mentor and my colleagues were professional, polite, and showed me how to do things without holding back. I forever appreciate that. Nevertheless, there was this invisible wall between me and them, like outside of work, I was on my own. All the time. But when you were young, you were never bothered by that. Or at least for me.

    I was fascinated by the sense of respect and boundaries total strangers presented, since it wasn’t this way in my hometown. Where I was from, it was not nice to reject somebody, i.e. saying no was a sign of disrespect. This didn’t sit well with my personality. Hong Kong people, even people I came across every day doing laundries or taking out food, were professional in their own jobs, boosting the overall efficiency in how the city runs. 

    My second time living in Hong Kong was about the same length, and two years apart from my first time. I returned to work at the same company as part of the rotation program, but instead of living in a tiny room in a rental apartment, I was living in a high-end service apartment paid out by the company. The apartment oversaw the Victoria Harbor, and it had an automatic curtain controlled by the TV remoter. I’d open the curtain every morning, looking down at the Harbor, enjoying the beautiful scenery of boats and ships moving. The apartment also had all kinds of amenities like rooftop pool, gyms, laundry and convenient store. Never in my wildest dreams could I have imagined that I’d be able to live like this in Hong Kong. Yet deep down I knew this wouldn’t last. 

    Hong Kong was one of those cities that you would always love to visit, but not to live and raise a family. Yet the professionalism and the optimism when people deal with pressure inevitably become part of me, and I’m forever grateful for that.

    The hustle and bustle in the City of Hong Kong

    In between my time in Hong Kong, I went to work for the Baltimore Ravens, the NFL team. The team’s HQ was located in Owings Mills in the suburb, but the game stadium in the city. Baltimore, together with the Baltimore Ravens organization, left a strong mark on me. 

    Baltimore was one of those cities in the United States that greatly deteriorated after the manufacturing industries left. Another city would be Pittsburgh, but the latter actually managed to restore some of its previous glories by developing a pharmaceutical and drug industry presence. Baltimore, on the other hand, didn’t have this luxury. 

    The city had this reputation of having some rough streets. I remember when I was leaving the city for good, I met a girl leaving for Dallas, which was where she was from, and the impression she got of the City was that there were lots of crackheads on the street. On the list of crime rates, Baltimore was always up there in the top five, some other cities being Detroit, St. Louis, etc. And the crime show “The Wire” didn’t help at all. 

    This reputation was embraced by the people of Baltimore, and reflected in the personality of the home team – Baltimore Ravens. The team was known for its tough defense, and some of the toughest defensive players in NFL such as Ray Lewis and Ed Reed. These guys were not to be messed with. 

    That toughness became part of me too, even though I left after only seven months. This is a strange feeling, since I wasn’t there for long, and there wasn’t really a whole lot of things to be proud of (just being honest here!). However, even I was proud to be part of this city, regardless of where I went. I could imagine speaking with somebody from NYC saying that I’m from Baltimore, explaining the good, the bad, and the ugly. But I wouldn’t change a thing. Maybe it was the Ravens. Maybe the people. Or the history. Probably a mix of everything.

    Orioles Park and Ravens Stadium

    Shantou was probably the last city that I’d expect to live in, but I was there for over three and a half years. The city was a special economic district in the south, but the economy was never truly developed up to expectations. Shantou was part of a three-city metropolis where the same local language was shared. The city is most famously known for its delicious food and the rich people originally from there (but all left to make their fortunes in other cities around the world).

    Rather than saying that the city left any mark on my personality, I’m more inclined to say that the people did. Teochow people were some of the most hardworking in the world. They were very dedicated to seeking fortunes in this world; there is a saying that Teochow people would rather start a small business and work 12 hours a day than work for others, even if the total compensations are more or less the same. 

    On top of their entrepreneurial propensity, Teochow people are also extremely loyal, and tend to unite to their own groups. This is probably one of the main reasons why they are successful, more so than any other ethnic groups, when they get into businesses. 

    I haven’t been back to Shantou for quite a long time. The personality of the people, i.e. their loyalty and hardworking nature, stayed with me ever since.

    Original City Downtown, Shantou

    Shanghai … is probably one of those cities that you would hate when you didn’t move here, but love once you did. This dichotomy of love and hate appears on mostly everybody I know. Even compared with those from Hong Kong or Beijing, people from Shanghai possess this swag that make them extremely proud of the fact that “they are from here”. Sort of like New Yorkers.

    On the first day I was here looking for a job, an acquaintance told me that Shanghai is probably the most un-Chinese city in China. I didn’t understand it then, and to an extent, still couldn’t comprehend the meanings behind his words today. But I do know Shanghai is … different.

    The swag could be interpreted as being obnoxious; people here could be very cold. They tend to stick to the rules. When you go to groceries, you’d often hear the elderly people arguing on small things like how the package of good is broken, etc. I couldn’t understand this, as in the traditional sense this is all quite face-losing, but people like these actually make Shanghai great. When most people are like this, the society self-corrects in a more effective way, as those businesses trying to produce only second-class products will be pushed down the drain.

    Shanghai has a face of warmness too. The elderly are never shy to start a conversation with a stranger, discussing things they see or read. There was one time that I was having lunch with a friend, and while we were parting our ways, an old lady came and asked if we could help take a picture of her in front of a sculpture in front of the office building. It was a workday, and she was by herself, yet the love of life she showed was so exuberant, that somehow the worries on our minds were lost at that moment. I even got a hug when she was leaving!

    Shanghai really got the best of both worlds. It’s both Chinese and Western; traditional and fast-growing; cold and warm at the same time. I often say that Shanghai people live their lives with their heads up, and I’d kill to have that swag or mentality. And now after six years living here, I have it.

    The Bund, Shanghai.

    To people who have never left their birth place, I feel sorry for them, as they would never be able to understand how people from other places live their lives. You can always visit as a tourist, but living in a different city is an experience that cannot be replicated through tourism. 

    If you ask me which is my favorite city after all these life experiences? While I don’t have one right now, but I’m proud to call Shanghai my home. And I won’t be the person I am now without all of these experiences. 

    Peace. Out.

  • Liabilities: Current and Noncurrent

    In previous episodes of the Learning Finance series, I’ve learned Basics of Balance Sheetdifferent types of assets, how to use Balance Sheet to understand how companies work, and the basic rules of asset pricing system. Now we are moving on to the right side of the Balance Sheet.

    On the right side of the balance sheet there are two sections – liabilities and shareholder’s equity. Let’s get into liability first. 

    Current vs. Non-current Liabilities

    Similar to how assets are structured into current and non-current ones, liabilities are also structured the same way. Current liabilities are to be repaid within the next 12 months, and non-current liabilities beyond 12 months. Pretty easy to remember. 

    Current Liabilities

    Short-term Borrowing

    Short-term borrowings are bank loans with a 12-month or less maturity. Bank loans beyond that will be considered as long-term debt or long-term loans payable. For our company in the Balance Sheet, it has over 1.2 billion dollars of short-term borrowings.

    Accounts Payables

    Whom will a business owe money to besides banks? 

    Well when a business sells goods to a customer, the customer may not pay the business right away, i.e. owing money to the business. Thus, the business has accrued accounts receivable, i.e. the right to collect the agreed-upon amount of money at a later time, and meantime, the customer has accounts payable with the same amount, i.e. the obligation to pay the business the agreed-upon amount of money at a later time. For our company, it has 688 millions of accounts payables.

    Other Payables

    One example would be one of my friends has a temporary cash flow issue, so he borrowed a million dollars from me. What do we call this? To me the lender, it is other receivable; to him, it is other payable. For our company, it has 9 million dollars of other payables.

    Deposits Received

    Now let’s go back to the situation when we purchase raw materials from the supplier. The supplier may ask for an upfront deposit, or prepaid accounts. This advance to supplier grants me the right to receive delivery of goods, and all goods are rightfully my assets. This prepayment will also become the supplier’s obligation, or a liability. This particular liability item is called deposits received, or advances from customers. Our company doesn’t have any deposits received from its customers.

    Other Liabilities

    There are many other items in the liability category, which are put into one line of item called other liabilities. This item is actually a combination of a number of items, so we need to break it down. 

    If you look at it carefully, you will find this item is not a small amount; it is over a billion dollars. What do you think might be included in there?

    In other words, whom will the business owe money to besides the bank, the suppliers and the customers?

    Well first, almost all businesses owe money to their employees, since most businesses pay wages in the next month after their employees have provided their services. Of course this liability will be paid off very soon, or else employees will soon become ex-employees. This salary owed to the employees is called accrued payroll.

    All businesses also owe money to the tax bureau on a regular basis, for the reason that most businesses don’t prepay taxes. What they do instead is paying taxes in the next month. So when the accountants prepare financial statements at the end of each month, there are taxes owed to the tax bureau. This liability is called taxes payable.

    As a matter of fact, almost every business has accrued payroll and taxes payable.

    Non-current Liabilities

    Long-term Loans Payable

    We went through this item briefly when we were talking about short-term borrowing. Long-term loans payable are essentially bank loans beyond 12 months. Our company has over 1.3 billion dollars of long-term loans, more than its short-term borrowings.

    Bond Payable

    Bonds are debt products issued by the company, and not all companies can issue bonds. As you can see, our company has no bond payable.

    Long-term Payable

    Long-term payables are related to certain specific kind of transactions such as leases. 

    Normally when we rent something, the ownership of the product is not transferred. But in accounting, there might be instances where we need to document leases in the Balance Sheet. 

    Leases are divided into two categories – operating leases and financial leasesOnly financial leases are long-term payables.

    When a lease is relatively long, and involves a large amount of money, it is often treated as a financial lease. Otherwise it is an operating lease. If a lease is considered an operating lease, then we are renting something we don’t own, i.e. the ownership is NOT transferred. Operating leases are expenses paid out by the company, therefore they don’t show up on the balance sheet. 

    Financial leases, on the other hand, are treated as if we are paying a loan for an asset. Therefore, it means that the ownership of the asset is transferred, and the rentals are portions of the loan. In fact, from the moment we sign the lease contract of that asset, all the future rental expenses will turn into liability, also known as long-term payable.

    Operating lease vs. Financial Lease
  • Fair Value vs. Historical Cost: Rules, Applications, and Exceptions

    In the previous episodes of the Learning Finance series, I’ve learned the Basics of Balance Sheet, have learned the different types of assets, and how to use Balance Sheet to understand how companies work.

    Every asset item is followed by a number, and that number is the value of that asset. How can I determine the value of an asset?

    Historical Cost vs. Fair Value

    I’m facing two choices:

    1. I can use the sum of money that I spent when I bought the asset at the time, i.e. the purchasing cost of the asset.
    2. I can use the current fair value, i.e. market price of the asset.

    At first, I’m tempted to use the fair value of the asset because it reflects the real value of the asset. This may work for me personally, but if I want to one day sell the company, this method could potentially be challenged. After all, it is impossible for me to find a selling price for every single asset in the market. For example, if I have a set of equipment in the past five years, I won’t be able to find a fair value for the equipment right away. 

    I thought about using the price of a new set of equipment with the same model, and I could then apply a discount to the price. However, even this seemingly feasible method contains flaws.

    What discount percentage should I use?

    10% of the original price?

    Or 90% of the original price?

    Both are “discounts” applied against the fair value of the equipment, but the gap between them is simply too large, thus rendering the method NOT objective.

    Accountant is a profession of prudent and conservative nature. Accountants dislike uncertainty, and when they face them, unwillingly, they’d rather err on the side of conservativeness, i.e. they would rather underestimate revenues and overestimate costs than vice versa.

    After eleminating the second option of determination of an asset’s price, I’m left with the first and only option, which is to use the original purchasing price as value of an asset. Because this transaction happened in the past, there is less room for dispute. 

    However, even though doing so offers me peace of mind, it also creates a new set of challenges. Because the value of many assets have fluctuated over the years, the original price doesn’t reflect the current reality. For instance, if I bought a piece of land 10 years ago for 500,000 USD, the current value of the land can easily go above 50 million USD in certain countries. Yet on the balance sheet, the land is still recorded as 500,000 USD – its original purchase price.

    Even though this imperfect dilemma exists, using the original purchasing price to document the value of an asset is still my best option. Most countries on this planet have adopted this method, and in accounting terms, it is called historical cost of an asset. In fact, accountants, with their conservative and prudent nature, will even go further than using historical costs of assets; that is, if there was a value increase of the asset, they would “pretend” the increase never happens, but if there was a value decrease of the asset, they would document this decrease with a deduction (what an a**hole!). So if I want to be specific, the asset pricing system is a historical cost system with deduction on devalued assets.

    The goal of a Balance Sheet is to reflect the real value of assets. Because often there lacks a common, objective standard in valuing the market value of an asset, we have to use the historical cost in the asset pricing mechanism as our second-best choice.

    Now we have established that in pricing assets, the historical cost system is the way to go. Is there a type of asset with a relatively objective fair value, a price that everyone is likely to agree on at any given time? 

    There actually is.

    Financial Asset – An Exception to Historical Cost

    If you think about it, one such type of asset will be public stocks. On any given day, the stock price of any public company is set by the stock market. People all over the world can see and trade on stocks, and there is little argument in the objectiveness of public stocks. 

    This asset category is called financial asset, among which stocks are part of. Because there exist an active market for most financial assets, people can reach consensus on their fair values. Therefore, there is no need for us (and the accountants!) to use historical costs for financial assets, since we have a better option to value them. We can simply use fair value for financial assets on our balance sheet.

    Real Estate – Another Exception (with Caveat)

    Other than financial assets, is there any other asset with this character? Well, you guessed it – real estate, but not any type of real estate, only real estate intended for investments. 

    Next to financial assets, the real estate market is also active, thus its price objective and transparent. However, our intended usage does make a difference here; ONLY if our goal is to lease the property to tenants, or hold and sell at a later stage, etc., i.e. treating the real estate as investment, then we can use the fair value in documenting the value for the real estate. If we intend to use the property as office building or manufacturing plant, we will have to resort to using the purchasing price as its value on the balance sheet. 

    Understanding Economic Activities

    In a nutshell, financial assets and real estate intended for investments are recorded with their fair values on the balance sheet. Other than those, most asset items are measured at historical costs with deduction when they devalue. 

    Understanding how asset values are measured can help explain why companies conduct transactions that may appear difficult to understand. For example, a company sells out one of its assets, but buys it back a week later. The asset changes very little during this week; so why does the company even bother to do all of these? 

    The reason that this company risks all the trouble is related to the concept of historical cost. Because of this rule, the value of this asset on the balance sheet is always equal to the purchasing price, as long as it’s not sold. To increase the value of this asset, the only way is to make a new deal, i.e. selling and buying it back. 


    By now, we’ve learned the meaning of each asset items, the structure of assets, and how assets are valued. We have already gained a comprehensive understanding to assets – the left side of Balance Sheet. All definition of terminologies such as cash, fair value, etc. can be found from here. Next we will liabilities and shareholder’s equity – the right side of Balance Sheet.